835 Denial Combination
CO-16+N179
Contractual Obligation · Claim-Level Adjustment
Missing InformationWhat This Combination Means
The payer has identified missing information or billing errors on the claim and is requesting additional information directly from the patient/member rather than the provider. The CO group code indicates this is a contractual write-off at present, but the claim will be reconsidered once the payer receives the requested information from the member. This is an unusual combination where the provider's billing error has triggered a member-directed information request.
Financial Responsibility
provider writeoff
The provider must write off this amount under contractual obligation while awaiting the payer's receipt of information from the member. If the member provides the requested information and the claim is reconsidered favorably, the payer may reprocess and pay.
N/A
Appeal Success
30-60 days (dependent on member response)
Avg. Resolution
Medium
Difficulty
No
Appealable
Step-by-Step Resolution
Steps tailored specifically to this CO-16+N179 combination — not generic advice.
- 1
Identify what information the payer requested from the member
Contact the payer to understand what specific information was requested from the member and why a billing error triggered a member inquiry rather than a provider request.
- 2
Contact the member/patient to ensure they respond to the payer's request
Proactively reach out to the patient to confirm they received the payer's information request and assist them in understanding what needs to be provided to avoid claim abandonment.
- 3
Monitor for automatic reconsideration after member response
Track the claim for automatic reprocessing once the payer receives member information; if no update occurs within 45 days of member response, contact payer to request manual reconsideration.
Specialty Context
How CO-16+N179 typically presents across different practice types.
Dental
May occur when dental claims require patient attestation of coordination of benefits or confirmation of dependent status that was not properly documented on the original claim submission.
Medical
Common when claims involve secondary payer situations, medical necessity questionnaires, or patient consent forms that the payer requires directly from the member due to incomplete provider submission.
Behavioral Health
May arise when behavioral health claims require patient confirmation of out-of-network provider choice, treatment consent acknowledgment, or verification of referral details that were improperly documented by the provider.
Individual Code References
View the standalone definition for each code in this combination.
Medicare Contractor Guidance for CARC 16
FCSO + Noridian + uhc + aetna + bcbs_azThis RUC is received when a claim is submitted with missing, incorrect, or invalid information. For details pertaining to your claim, please refer to the remittance advice remark codes (RARCs) on the remittance advice (RA).
How to Prevent CARC 16 Denials
- ✓
Review the RARC on the remittance advice to identify which specific field has the error.
- ✓
Per Medicare guidelines, claims must be filed no later than 12 months after the date of service. RUCs are not considered filed/submitted.
Need to resolve this denial?
Get a complete resolution plan with appeal guidance for this exact combination in seconds.
Generate a free resolution plan & appeal letter →Synthesized from official definitions — not from training data